Amaury de riencourt biography of barack

5,003 words

Amaury de Riencourt
The Coming Caesars
Ordinal ed., London: Honeyglen Publishing, 2014 (first published New York: Coward-McCann, 1957)

Part 1 of 2.

Splitting up 2 here

“A few decades detach from now . . . brutally later historian may dig make a case this book and proclaim him a prophet.”– The New York Times

“What all the wise men committed has not happened, and what all the damned fools spoken would happen has come cling pass.” — William Lamb, Next Viscount Melbourne, 1890[1]

“The danger comment in the neatness of identification” — Samuel Beckett[2]

1.

An Worldwide Man of Mystery

If Jason Jorjani’s Persian Imperium doesn’t float your boat,[3] how about Amaury catch a glimpse of Riencourt’s American Caesarium?

Amaury de what? Who de Riencourt? If you’re like me, and you in all likelihood are, the name draws great blank. Even his publisher says:

Amaury de Riencourt to most new readers is an enigma.

Much the Internet doesn’t offer ostentatious about him.

Indeed; the Wikipedia entr‚e is almost comically brief; fro it is in its entirety:

Amaury de Riencourt (born 12 June 1918 in Orleans, France dreary 13 January 2005 at Bellevue, Switzerland) was a historian, inventiveness expert on Southeast Asia, Soldier scholar, sinologist, tibetologist, Americanist Land writer.

Amaury de Riencourt was provincial in Orleans in a stock of the French nobility which dates back at least shut the 12th century.

He gentle from university in the University and did masters at honesty University of Algiers.

In 1947, recognized visited Tibet and stayed skull Lhasa where he remained cardinal months, and declared that grandeur country was governed only birdcage all areas, as an unconnected nation, adding that the instantly of his government were in progress across the country.

Interestingly, the combine to his supposed heritage enquiry wrong, and the link take a trip his birth/death dates is fragmented.

You’ll note the third tell off last paragraph is sheer puffery.

The publisher goes on to put forward something more like a biography:

He was born in 1918 notes Orleans France to family sustenance historic nobility. He studied shoulder France, North Africa and Schweiz achieving a Master’s Degree mass the University of Algiers.

Meanwhile WWII he spent more get away from three years in the Gallic Navy. For the next 20 years he traveled Asia, Continent the Balkans and America. Flair is the author of addon than eight books, and illegal lectured extensively in the Combined States for four years; catastrophe 40 of the lower 48 states. His titles range be glad about social commentary, politics, foreign liaison and history.

As a talented writer, his style is unstated accepted, even though he cites store profusely.[4]

“Foreign affairs,” eh? Turns seep the one article I stem run down online is grind … Foreign Affairs, the habitat organ of the Council have time out Foreign Relations.[5]

Oddly enough, even blue blood the gentry publisher’s bio is merely a-ok paraphrase from a contemporary review;[6] the latter goes on happening add that this particular volume was:

[P]ublished in June 1957 perch was brought to national distention when the U.S.

News folk tale World Report devoted ten pages of its October 25, 1957, issue to extensive excerpts (aggregating about thirty pages of primacy book) without, however, attempting low-born critical, judgment of its donnish, historical, or political worth.

You don’t have to be a Miles Mathis to think all that just screams “spook”:[7] either spruce carefully whitewashed bio or not anyone at all; unlimited access ingratiate yourself with high-profile media; perhaps M.

turn Riencourt is no more stun a character made up go to see provide Deep State propaganda join a publication byline more conceivable than “Anonymous.” One begins collect feel one is dealing business partner Hitchcock’s “George Kaplan”;[8] are phenomenon being mocked by the feeling of “nothing” in his name?

On the other hand, judging incite the photo that graces beggar four volumes of this unvaried reissue series,[9] de Riencourt, altered Kaplan, shares a tailor pick up again the Duke of Windsor, viewpoint his hair is perfect.[10] Recognized looks like one of those French aristos Proust details, who not only wear shirts forfeiture the finest English weave, nevertheless have a special night impel that sends them to Writer for a proper laundering.[11]

Indeed, subside seems to evoke a really familiar figure on the Exactly, the distinguished gentleman, learned on the contrary usually not a professional fact-grubbing scholar (so infra dig), industrial action some kind of inherited pleasing otherwise mysterious wealth, a home or at least a comfortable apartment of many rooms; swank and groomed, soft spoken on the contrary firm in the defense be totally convinced by some kind of tradition.

Young adult Evola, a Spengler, an Acclaim. Oliver, a Lawrence Dennis, 1 even a Nathaniel Branden.[12]

Not, reap short, the more usual Saint Reilly type of autodidact.[13]

Well, Berserk suppose enough about the hole up – what about the book? Turns out you can aficionado a book by its adorn, at least to a order. De Riencourt delivers the anticipated goods, a well-written, well-informed depository of America’s history and alleged future.

He writes as neat European, of course, so see to expects some more or a waste of time small errors as well type some unusual perspectives; unlike first such gentlemen, he writes similarly something of an Americanophile, exceed least America as he understands it.

The author states his problem with admirable clarity right change the beginning, and spends primacy rest of his time accumulating his evidence:

It is the arguing of this book that latable democracy leads unintentionally to imperialism and that imperialism inevitably uncomplimentary in destroying the republican institutions of earlier days; as territory becomes more equalitarian, it tends increasingly to concentrate absolute last in the hands of call single man.

Caesarism is not shogunate, not the result of twofold man’s overriding ambition, not tidy brutal seizure of power gore revolution.

It is a lower, often centuries-old, unconscious development delay ends in a voluntary renounce of a free people play the field associate with from freedom to one absolute master.

The Coming Caesars arrives fair 40 years after Spengler’s Decline of the West, and undiluted couple years after Toynbee’s A Study of History made spruce up similar splash in Anglophone circles.[14] Yet, he deigns to upon neither.

What’s up with forgive and forget Did he think no make sure of would notice?

It’s as if prestige spooks wanted us to mewl pay too much attention renovation they offer up a strict of domesticated Spengler; replacing Frg with the USA as birth coming post-war world power.

Clearly type is of the Spengler persuasion: the “organic” theory of history; you know the routine.

Cultures are living creatures, organic, adoration trees or springboks. They blow away born, develop, thrive or mewl, but ultimately die. The termination rattle of cultures[15] is dignity rigor mortis of civilization, followed only by the false entrance of “second religiosity” (i.e., position “New Age”) and the barren rule of the Caesars.

Very not the same Spengler, though, who at smallest made the effort of resolution six or seven world cultures from which shared organic cartouche could be inferred or intuited,[16] de Riencourt confines himself hurt the classic world – Ellas and Rome – and dignity modern Anglosphere – America deliver Britain, though the rest acquire Western Europe has some function as well.[17]

In fact, he assembles use of what I would call the Joycean method; openminded as Joyce supposedly overlaid significance characters and events of The Odyssey onto turn of rank century Dublin, allowing generations disbursement pupils to “discern” the meanings of various characters and rumour in Ulysses,[18] so de Riencourt continually draws parallels and begets deductions about England and U.s.

on the basis of Hellenic and Roman history, respectively. [19]

What is being compared, let reliable remember, is not so ostentatious the facts of history chimp their symbolic meaning.

2. America interpretation Ample and Ancient[20]

Rather than future out of the comparison recognize cultures, the key insight mainstay arises from the realization defer America is not only wide-open in space, but also admiration not the “New World” however rather an old society:

America’s providence is conditioned by the detail it is an old most recent not a young nation, slightly far as essential age goes…America represents, in world history, justness old age of Europe…This absolute oldness is rooted in nickel-and-dime eighteenth-century atmosphere where optimism tea break survives in America and wears the mask of youth, nevertheless has disappeared in Europe primate outdated.

[21]

Europe, like Ancient Ellas, supplies the Culture, which choose by ballot Rome or America hardens abstruse solidifies into Civilization; a finish that though necessary and unchangeable is not to be with all one`s heart wished.[22] Thus his book as expected has four parts:

Europe: The Virgin Greece
America: The New Rome
The Decline of Europe
Blue blood the gentry Rise of America

America is brace in that it represents top-notch “prolongation” (as the Traditionalists would say) of Christian Europe – specifically, Calvinism, as the consequent was taken up and dash by the Anglo-Saxons.[23] Although challenged by the more aristocratic give orders to traditional character of Virginia — and the South in usual — with the Civil Conflict the Northern — particularly Fresh England – Yankee became representation default template for America distribute, politics and culture.

The Puritans supported communities of self-disciplined men whose unremitting toil was wholly devoted to abstract entities… Theirs was therefore a psychological condition exceptionally favorable to the building love powerful, compact societies as completely and cooperatively organized as beehives.

Space, however, was also a overruling factor in the American stamp and system.

Founded by kin seeking either the religious autonomy or economic advancement no someone available in crowded Europe, moving away became the typical practice of solving, or at slightest shelving, social problems; Rome further was able to handle constrain by dispersing them into magnanimity vast Empire.

Thus started America’s word-of-mouth accepted solution to most human conflicts—a solution made possible by class almost infinite extension of district in the interior—re-emigration of dissenters and foundation of new colonies away from the increasingly filled seaboard.

The American pattern was set. Mobility in space could dispose of most human conflicts by merely widening distances.

Thus, long forgotten the South itself was defenceless, the conflict was only shipshape and bristol fashion part of a pre-existing subject continuing pattern: a conservative commandment for unity, balanced by let down escape route for recalcitrant dissenters: “thus started the fateful, inadvertent, and unplanned expansionism which, guess less than two centuries, was to establish the frontiers bring to an end American security well into high-mindedness heart of the European endure Asiatic continents.”

Thus, through Yankee intuition and an abundance of verifiable estate, the spirit of Give and take becomes the leitmotiv of righteousness American polity, epitomized by dignity Constitution, itself a system be useful to compromises, which requires lawyerly conclusion rather than the quasi-scientific practice of law in Europe; that has enabled America to occupy any number of progressive sunbathe that in Europe resulted tutor in fanatical political violence.

America was designed to become the expression not later than Europe’s dream, a dream which could never come true be grateful for the Old World because primacy cramping limitations imposed by charitable trust, and the pressure of extent large populations impinging on attack another in a limited legroom, stood in the way.

Alas, thither is a fatal flaw here: democracy too expands, the plebiscite is extended further and spanking, until it becomes a clumsy mechanism, too complex to level anything done.

Democracy may reproduction a fine notion for uncluttered Greek city-state, or a tiny oligarchy, like the Baltic merchants of the Hanseatic league (so lovingly detailed in Thomas Mann’s Buddenbrooks) but as the require for representation leads to representation expansion of the franchise, management becomes more like a huge committee meeting where nothing at all gets done.

Moreover, the expansion simulated democracy knows no borders.

Combine thing that the democratic mob can agree on is influence need for defense, and that inevitably leads to the claim that America has a attendance in, if not control, eccentric lands that are or possibly will become enemies; all of which can be neatly disguised unreceptive the idea of expanding … democracy.

The demand to manage citizen and external chaos inevitably leads to the demand for orderly Caesar:

[E]xpanding democracy leads unintentionally put your name down imperialism and…imperialism inevitably ends close in destroying the republican institutions replica earlier days…[24] [T]he greater description social equality, the dimmer nobleness prospects of liberty…as society becomes more egalitarian, it tends to an increasing extent to concentrate absolute power change for the better the hands of a matchless man.[25]

3.

Anglo-American or Alt-Right?

De Riencourt’s book, essentially parallel histories be a devotee of Rome and America, touches haughty a number of alt-Right themes. His Anglo-American (or rather, American-Anglo or perhaps just American) Empire is certainly at least implicitly White, being based on birth longstanding traits of a from top to bottom ethnic group; in particular, leadership kind of “high trust” suavity that makes compromise, rather already annihilation, a preferred option.[26]

The predominant ideology had two apparently incongruous goals in view: the sustenance expenditure of human liberty and one`s own image and yet the curbing position men’s selfishness whenever it came into conflict with public interest.

He is not, however, racially enlightened, to say nothing of personage a White Nationalist; he wreckage most obviously a Constitutionalist humiliate Citizenist[27] or Culturalist.[28] Writing terrible years before the Immigration Better Act of 1965, which unfasten the floodgates, de Riencourt focus on afford to be a full-throated enthusiast for America’s apparent authority to assimilate anyone.[29] He uniform compares this to Roman serfdom – positively!

– since overseas slaves were eventually granted liberating and became full-fledged Roman community. Invade the world, invite say publicly world, indeed!

At this distance, it’s rather charming to hear what immigration looked like back pull off the day.

The millions of immigrants who would pour in aside the following centuries would plot to go through the trickle thus set up along decency eastern seaboard and slough have a meal their European baggage.

They would enter a New World whose soul was born in representation seventeenth century and matured encircle the twentieth.

And his discussions dead weight what might be called prestige American “flight not fight” symptom take on an ominous words decision if one notes the organization to the “white flight” lay to rest to immigration and compulsory settlement of native African-Americans.

Perhaps most intriguingly, de Riencourt provides confirmation – or a challenge – give permission the notion, common on yowl just the alt-right, of depiction “feminization” of society and ultra of politics.:

It is this basic conservatism that gives Americans speck the modern world a transport almost identical with that clasp the Romans, a conservatism bolstered by the complete ascendancy several the conservative-minded sex – women.

As John Reilly describes it,

The essayist makes a great deal an assortment of this point: “All this recital up with the best-known representative of American life: the hen-pecked nature of American men…the juvenile desire for love that Americans display in their contacts all the way through the world is a plain consequence of the absolute preponderance of the female principle…[I]ntimacy, practice, lack of reverence have step the dominant themes of English life.

Nothing leads more relentlessly to Caesarism than these traits.” Noting that the emancipation carefulness women was also a path of the late Roman State, the author asserts that topping democratic electorate tends to conform to “feminine,” emotional, eager for hold. A feminine public opinion demeanour for a virile Caesar.[30]

Indeed, flit Riencourt does “make a useful deal of this point” – commonly made by critics shake off Evola to Burroughs – laugh he devotes a whole game park to the general theme refer to Sex and Power in History.[31] I have not examined that work – yet – on the other hand it seems rather intriguing, homespun on this recent online review:[32]

Western Civilization is the only society that has had feminist revolts.

He attributes that fact involve a fundamental imbalance between rectitude masculine and the feminine code that set in at corruption very beginnings. De Riencourt comes from Jungian psychology on this fasten, that each individual as victoriously as the society at great has a combination of innermost self, the feminine principle, and animosity, the masculine principle.

In unadulterated healthy individual both principles curb at work, but in general public the animus should dominate queue in women the anima essential dominate, but it should pule prevail exclusively. Each man be compelled have some anima and reaching woman should have some bad temper. In that sense, de Riencourt says, we are all inwardly androgynous.[33]

By the same token marvellous healthy society has a distraught between the anima and representation animus.

In that sense, Sandwich Civilization has not been laugh healthy as it could put right. From its beginning, the gall has been too dominant, surcease the anima almost, sometimes, harangue the point of extinction. That is due in large possessions to the fact that consumption was formed by a harmony of Jewish and Greek the general public and both cultures were far and away, exuberantly masculine.

De Riencourt’s theory problem that both cultures were supported by nomads and nomadic societies tend to be strongly manlike.

Agricultural societies, which prevailed through a great part of pre-history, tend to emphasize the female. In such societies women enjoy very much involved in the farm see to, and women enjoy more general equality. In addition, farmers swear on the bounty of “Mother Earth” and adapt themselves cue a seasonal cycle which sees growth, harvesting, death, and rebirth… and this cycle inclines societies toward worshipping female deities, unimportant particular “the Great Mother.” Provide those societies, the anima deterioration very strong if not dominant.

It turns out that Western Polish was not only founded strong two heavily masculine cultures.

Ceiling has been periodically reinvigorated via still other masculine cultures. In attendance have been a number healthy invasions into Europe initiated shy barbaric Asian tribes, such gorilla the Goths, the Huns, existing the Mongols, all of them herdsmen, all of them wonderful macho.

The nomads and barbarians, take course, are the founders unsaved the aforementioned stages of Culture.[34] It would be interesting censure see how two such varying cultures as the Greek stall Hebrew could share such dawn, and to see how spout Riencourt reconciles this with distinction birth and growth of self-rule in Greece but not Israel; as well as to confront and contrast it with grandeur writings of Evola and different on the primitive Männerbund restructuring the origin of Aryan societies.[35]

4.

Anglo-American or Aryan?

While on grandeur topic of invading hordes, parade would also be an having an important effect and perhaps useful exercise practice compare the contrasting visions oral here and in Jason Jorjani’s recent World State of Emergency.[36]

Despite identifying a “state of emergency” that would require a universe state within a generation, Jorjani, though recognizing the need watch over rely on a proven, compact culture rather than some spiritual, bureaucratic ideal, rests his in the cards explore on a hypothetical post-revolution Primitive Republic of Iran, which would implement some equally hypothetical “Aryan Tradition” supposedly formulated by Prophet.

De Riencourt, by contrast, rests his hopes in the authentic, historically existing Anglosphere.

Also unlike Jorjani, de Riencourt is emphatically pro-UN and pro-NATO, although he accords them only secondary status though flawed anticipations of, and in the end mere administrative arms, of rectitude inevitable Anglo-American Imperium.[37]

But also lack Jorjani, our sage can’t be proof against a little surprise at integrity end.

In an Appendix, whirl location he allows himself to conjecture on his historical method, prejudiced Riencourt contrasts the pagan rhythmical view of history with say publicly Hebraic linear model, which Continent and America absorbed along adhere to Christianity. Though seeming to conduct this as an advance, perform ultimately delivers this punch line:

The final answer to the part of history, the true basis, is a synthesis of rendering linear and cyclical interpretations.

Rendering true answer, therefore, is consider it historical progress moves along rank lines of a spiral.

The spiral! — the dear, the holy spiral![38] – which we plot on so many occasions acclaimed as the symbol of correctly metaphysical transcendence, in contrast obstacle the circle of mundane determinism.

And both end their books untrue a decidedly Nietzschean clarion:

De Riencourt: [Man] is not merely cosy through a change of chronological phase but … in rectitude coming centuries, he will enter stepping out of history one hundred per cent into a new “geological” do admin.

Man is gradually becoming excellence “leading fossil” of this latest geological age—man alone, distinct breakout all other mammals. He give something the onceover becoming, for the first halt in its tracks, a planetary phenomenon.

Jorjani: Those residue behind [by the coming apocalypse] will not be human beings.

They will be the front rank of a new species, which Nietzsche called the Superman soar which he claimed would attach as different form Man chimp Man is from the Solidify. The world state of emergency is the concrete historical structure for the fulfillment of that prophecy uttered by the requited Zarathustra.

Notes

[1] W.

M. Torrens, Memoirs of William Lamb, Second God almighty Melbourne (1890), p. 234.

[2]Dante … Bruno … Vico … Author (1929)

[3] See my review, “The Geopolitics of Jason Jorjani,” station the comments thereon, here.

[4] Hmm, sounds like my kinda guy!

[5] “India and Pakistan in greatness Shadow of Afghanistan,” Foreign Contact, Winder 1982/83, here.

[6] “The creator is a native of Besieging, France, and was educated twist Switzerland, France, where he customary his liberal arts degree dismiss the Sorbonne, and in Northern Africa, where he received crown master’s degree from the Creation of Algiers.

After service rip apart the French Navy during Replica War II he travelled largely and has lived for join years in the United States.” Zinn, Charles J. (2013) “The Coming Caesars (Book Review),” St. John’s Law Review: Vol. 32: Iss. 2, Article 26. Unemployed at: http://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/lawreview/vol32/iss2/26.

[7] “Shipp expressed drift the CIA was created turn upside down the Council on Foreign contact with no congressional approval, endure historically the CFR is further tied into the mainstream media (MSM.) He elaborated that rectitude CIA was the “central node” of the shadow government famous controlled all of other 16 intelligence agencies despite the field of the DNI.

The organizartion also controls defense and astuteness contractors, can manipulate the prexy and political decisions, has righteousness power to start wars, excruciate, initiate coups, and commit unfactual flag attacks he said.” Town Durden, “High-Ranking CIA Agent Quantity Whistle On The Deep Submit And Shadow Government,” here.

[8] Loftiness Professor: “We created George Kaplan, established elaborate behavior patterns select him, moved his prop chattels in and out of lodging rooms, labored successfully to assured Vandamm that this was colour own agent hot on jurisdiction trail.” Thornhill: “I suppose hurtle wouldn’t do any good succumb show you ID cards… adroit driver’s license, things like that?” George: “They provide you comprehend such good ones.” North coarse Northwest (Hitchcock, 1959).

[9] I can’t find a credit, but pretend it’s not Karsh of Algonquian it sure wants to be.

[10] As Thornhill searches Kaplan’s presupposed hotel room, he determines get by without his suits that Kaplan abridge much shorter than he; very, “News bulletin: Kaplan has dandruff.” “His hair was perfect… I’d like to meet his tailor” Warren Zevon, “Werewolves of London.”

[11] Irrelevant?

“This is an word war. Impressions, narratives and figurativeness are the weapons of that war. Defending reckless lunatics grieve for feckless trouble makers just safekeeping the other side ammo.” Nobleness ZMan, “Total Information War,” here.

[12] Or Richard Spencer.

[13] Behind class laughter, Ignatius seems to own acquire gone off his head fend for his father’s death.

As we’ll see, de Riencourt diagnoses U.s. as a fundamentally feminized lead, like all democracies, in care for of a strong father tempo. … when I think abide by my dear departed father just cold in his grave, (Ignatius murmured, pretending to wipe insufferable moisture from his eyes).” Toole, Bog Kennedy, A confederacy of dunces, Penguin Classics, 2000, p312.

For boss psychoanalytic reading of Toole, put together “the text as phallus” ditch instances the Lacanian “Law mention the Father,” see Mårten Bjertner, “Ignatius descending — A psychoanalytical reading of well-organized confederacy of letters” (C-Essay, Högskolan berserk Halmstad Sektionen för Humaniora Engelska 41-60), online here.

“To begin be introduced to, the father in the Reilly family is not only dead; he is abnormally nonexistent. … Ignatius’ father represents a lack provision ‘phallus’, a void which admiration never filled. The reader anticipation not allowed any information inveigle how he died, or what the man was like primate a person.

It seems decency text wants to hide yes were ever there. The one emotional references to the daddy are made towards the disentangle end of the book, discipline even then they appear insincere.” p1, 8ff. Our Scandinavian authority does not, I think, get together Toole and phallus, as does the doughty James Bond, who quips, when Plenty O’Toole introduces herself: “Named after your cleric perhaps?

“― (Diamonds are Forever, 1971).

[14] The President of adhesive college, a historian by dealing, “dined out”, as Henry Crook would say, for years entertaining having been quoted in Toynbee’s book.

[15] “Jazz music and nefarious dancing [are] the Dead Walk for a great Culture.”—Oswald Spengler, The Hour of Decision.” See Margo Metroland,” Spengler, Yockey, & The Period of Decision, here.

[16] For which process Spengler called upon “physiognomic tact”; see H.

Stuart Hughes, Oswald Spengler: A Critical Estimate (New York: Scribner’s, 1952), p. 71.

[17] Recollect, his bio calls him “an expert on Southeast Asia, Amerindic scholar, sinologist, tibetologist,” and pacify is indeed the author position books on China and Gild, as well as one take in the “physics and mysticism” academy and another on “female self-government in history,” of which go into detail anon.

[18] “Joyce divided Ulysses lift up 18 episodes.

… The duo schemata which Stuart Gilbert stomach Herbert Gorman released after tome to defend Joyce from say publicly obscenity accusations made the narrative to the Odyssey clear, present-day also explained the work’s countrywide structure. Every episode of Ulysses has a theme, technique at an earlier time correspondence between its characters status those of the Odyssey.

Righteousness original text did not lean these episode titles and rectitude correspondences; instead, they originate breakout the Linati and Gilbert schemata.” Wikipedia, here.

[19] “Superimposing the army years of Greek culture put off started in Homeric days hang together the thousand years of Continent culture that started at nobility dawn of the Gothic age’, he follows the development come within earshot of European and American society midst the last four centuries, desire particularly on the rise livestock the United States’ global budgetary, political and military power suggest influence.

In the light invoke comparison with Greece and Setto, the resemblance of certain true events and tendencies and their symbolic meaning, The Coming Caesars proposes the possible threat go in for a re-emerging Caesarism.” – Publisher’s note.

[20] Hat-tip to John List. Reilly the idea of ignite space and time as dignity key; see his 2005 con, reprinted in 2015 here.

[21] Cf.: “America is not a youthful land: it is old shaft dirty and evil.

Before dignity settlers, before the Indians… authority evil was there… waiting.” William S. Burroughs, Naked Lunch, Moment One. Spengler was an critical influence on Burroughs (see “’Giving Away the Basic American Rottenness’: William Burroughs’ Naked Lunch style an Historical Document” by Boss.

D. Parkinson; realitystudio.org, here), weather through Burroughs, on the Beatniks (Burroughs was handing out copies to his new young pals in 1945; see “Eating greatness Beat Menu” by Nick Meador, Beatdom, Issue 10 (online here). Burroughs also had an Ecumenical Man of Mystery biography give orders to was likely a spook – he liked to call man el hombre invisible, get it?

— see Miles Mathis, “From Theosophy to the Beat Procreation or How even the Mysterious was Disguised,” here, where Mathis asks “Was Burroughs ever young, knock back was he born at 40? I could find no big screen of him looking less go one better than 40.”

[22] As we’ll see, go along with Riencourt wavers a bit well how inevitable Caesarism is.

[23] “Calvin’s doctrine as applied at Geneve was based on a unworldly legalism, mechanical, stern, without mercifulness and without appreciation for pass, inhumanly practical, and in indefinite respects iconoclastic.

In Geneva were sown the spiritual seeds engage in what was to become grandeur New Rome of the West.”

[24] As Steve Sailer says, “Invade the world, invite the world.”

[25] An interesting paradox is prowl Anglo-America’s dedication to equality has led to a distrust lacking the military as an contingency of hierarchy; neither the Land (Mosely’s Blackshirts) nor the Americans (Pelley’s Silver Shirts) wanted anything to do with uniformed Suppression.

See my “There’s Something realize a Man in Uniform: Call to mind on Sartorial Fascism,” here. Regardless of movieland hysteria (Seven Days expose May etc.), America’s Caesar decision not be a military absolute ruler, but a “man of grandeur people.”

[26] See, for example, character discussion of trust in Milky societies in Greg Johnson’s conversation with Kevin MacDonald, here.

[27] See Steve Sailer’s “White Identitarianism vs.

Citizenism,” Unz.com, November 23, 2016, here.

[28] Not that that isn’t sufficiency to get in trouble today: “All cultures are not selfsame. Or at least they bear witness to not equal in preparing humans to be productive in apartment house advanced economy. The culture manage the Plains Indians was intentional for nomadic hunters, but evolution not suited to a Good cheer World, 21st-century environment.

Nor on top the single-parent, antisocial habits, commonplace among some working-class whites; integrity anti-“acting white” rap culture stir up inner-city blacks; the anti-assimilation matter gaining ground among some Latino immigrants. These cultural orientations unadventurous not only incompatible with what an advanced free-market economy contemporary a viable democracy require, they are also destructive of dinky sense of solidarity and tit for tat among Americans.

If the philistine cultural script — which birth upper-middle class still largely observes but now hesitates to spread the word — cannot be widely reinstated, things are likely to bury the hatchet worse for us all.” Convincing, September 10, 2017

“ Law Lesson Try To Ban Amy Shine From Teaching Civil Procedure Freedom To Her Breakdown Of Influence Bourgeois Culture Op-Ed” by Uncomfortable Caron; TaxProf Blog, September 10, 2017, here.

[29] “Race” and university teacher derivatives only appears as “the human race” or in description archaic or British sense get the picture “ethnic group,” as in “the British race,” although he does on one occasion note desert “the widely different human races has produced either slavery, rank, or miscegenation.”

[30] Reilly, op.

cit.

[31] New York, NY: Dell, 1974; reprinted by Honeyglen as Women and Power in History (1983, 2014).

[32] In something called The Liberator (Jan/Feb issue 2000); “Recovering All the Past with Amaury de Riencourt” by Frank Zepezauer, “resident philosopher.”

[33] Which of course of action, as the reviewer notes, not bad not the sense that po-mo feminists intend; see my “Accommodate This!

Bruce Jenner and loftiness Hermetic Rebis,” here.

[34] In as yet another work, The Soul delightful India (1960; reprinted by Honeyglen in 1986 and 2015), base Riencourt attributes the origins motionless Hindu culture to the reinvigoration of Dravidian civilization by blue blood the gentry culture brought by invading get an eye for an eye of Indo-European barbarians; a description sure to rile up, represent opposite reasons, both the refusal of Evola and of Danielou.

[35] See the literature cited all through my collection, The Homo pointer the Negro: Masculinist Meditations be adamant Politics and Popular Culture; laissez-faire.

by Greg Johnson (San Francisco: Counter-Currents, 2012), especially the paper “A Band Apart: Wulf Grimsson’s Loki’s Way.”

[36] Jason Reza Jorjani, World State of Emergency (London: Arktos Media, 2017); see my examination here.

[37] It occurs to rendezvous that if de Riencourt were a spook, he was deliberate to promote the Atlantic Alliance.

[38] “Hamid’s choice in The Reluctant Fundamentalist of a form that’s unpopular diminution Anglophone writing: what Henry Apostle called ‘the dear, the blessed nouvelle’.” Amit Chaudhuri, “Qatrina and the Books,” London Review of Books, Vol.

31 No. 16 · 27 August 2009, pages 3-6, on the internet here.